The
Piltdown Man was a fossil discovery that fooled scientist for decades. The fossils
were found in the small village of Piltdown in England by a man names Charles
Dawson in the early 1900’s. He was an amateur archeologist that specialized in
fish fossils, not human evolution. Though there is not a definitive hoaxer he
is the person most people blame for the deception. He also worked with a
geologist named Sir Arthur Smith Woodward. These two sent their finds to the
Britain Natural History Museum and it became a well-known and famous find. They
claimed the fossils they found were a perfect connection between humans and
apes. The jaw bone was more like an ape but the teeth had a very human like
wear to them. This supported some scientists’ views that we evolved a bigger
brain before we started to walk upright. This was a huge discovery for Britain
as well given that they had not had any early human fossils in their country.
The fossils gave them a sense of pride that they found the earliest human in
their own homeland. The fossils were kept in the museum and were not available
to many people for research. Later there was a chemical test developed to test
the age of fossils more accurately. This test showed that the Piltdown Man was
in fact much younger than advertised. This called for more research to be done
on the fossils which revealed more and more inconsistences. The bones had been
dyed to look older and the teeth had been filed down to look like human teeth. The
jaw bone was in fact just a female orangutan that was less than 100 years old and
the skull bones did not match at all. They were pieced together to make a
perfect puzzle. All of this came to
light due to better dating and aging tests.
The
fraud had been brought to light so many years after the public and scientific
community had accepted the fossils as truth that the aftermath was devastating.
The country as a whole felt duped and embarrassed. There had been many scientists
that studied the bones for their career and never knew they were faked. The
discovery of the lies caused many to question the authenticity of scientist. People
started to think that it was incredibly easy to trick them and therefore any
finds they make must be fake somehow. This deception caused many to doubt the
scientific method and its results. People tend to forget that it was science
that proved it to be a fake as well. Yes the scientists were fooled but the
technology advanced and they were able to see the lies.
Scientist
are curious by nature but they do make human mistakes as well. In this scenario
people were so excited to finally find such a significant evolutionary
discovery that they might have overlooked some key information. People had
started to doubt the Piltdown Man before the discovery was made public but some
scientists never wanted to believe it. In many situations the fossils gave the
scientists exactly what they wanted. The finds supported their hypothesis and
they did not want it to change. It is human of us to make mistakes but that
does not make it wrong. As a species humans have a thirst for knowledge. We are
curious about who we are and where we come from. It is this motivation that
drives science. If you take away the “humanness” then you potentially take away
the drive to learn more.
The
scientific technology had advanced enough to allow them to identify the fraud. The
use of chemicals was able to show that the bones were much younger than the
half a million years old they had originally thought. They also used microscopes
to see the scratches made when filling down the teeth and canine. They were
able to see the bones in better detail and see that they had been broken or
shaped to fit together.
We can
all learn from this situation. When we are given information that seems too
good to be true we might need to consider the source and do some additional
research. Even if the information given to us perfectly supports our own endeavors,
we need to make sure they are true. Science is ever changing and technologies are
growing. This can help us or hurt us, we just need to be sure of the
information we are given.
You made a very good point that I completely skipped over; this hoax made people doubt scientists and the whole scientific method. We all know that science is fact-based, but it was so easy for this monumental discovery to be faked that people seriously doubted the knowledge they had gotten from scientists, and even better point you made that it was scientists relentless study that found the deception and made the facts correct. I agree that taking away humanness from science could take away the want to know more. Who knows, if we took away the humanness in this scenario, we could possibly still believe the remains to be real.
ReplyDeleteKaren, I think that you gave a very great description of the situation! The excitement that the scientific community had to find an answer to an age-old question was very real, and certainly relatable. Everyone wants to be the one to find the answer to a burning question, so you can't really blame them for jumping the gun. But as scientists, we trust them to be able to put this aside before putting their name on a work or theory.
ReplyDeleteGreat opening synopsis, particularly your explanation of the significance of the find.
ReplyDeleteI agree that national pride was a huge factor in why this fraud was allowed to go unchecked but can you explain why the hoax was possibly perpetrated to begin with?
Good description of the technology that uncovered the hoax but can you describe how the process of science itself helped to reveal the hoax? Why were scientists still investigating this fossil some 40 years later?
"People tend to forget that it was science that proved it to be a fake as well."
Exactly. :-)
Good final conclusion.
I think you did well with your post, it hit all the key points and your conclusion was great. Your correct on the advancement of technology, and because there was an advance in technology it also help contribute to the discovery of the roots of the teeth. The microscope helped identify scratches on the teeth, so without these type of technological advancements we might still be wondering if the skull was real or fraud.
ReplyDelete